Recommended Artist research

Impasto- Ernst Ludwig Kirchner

https://www.britannica.com/biography/Ernst-Ludwig-Kirchner described his art as an “ immediate, powerful inner conflict into visual terms”. Unsurprisingly his influences included Drurer, Van Gough, Munch and artists of the Fauve movement. Angular, sweeping brush strokes in Swiss landscapes (1930’s) and the Berlin street series are iconic to his style. The street series really attracts me: colours are bold and his brush technique add so much to the post WW1 energy and captures the mood of the city. His subjects tend to be outlined in dark ( often black) bold sweeping lines. Inside this the deliberately obvious diagonal brush marks bring movement and along with the bending street views and elongated figures suggest a sort of malevolence as prostitutes mingle with passing smartly dressed men.

An exhibition at New York’s Neue Galerie ( January 2020) includes a quote from the artist about his work across a variety of media including textile collaborations, pastels , wood cuts and oils as “a tightly woven, organic fabric, in which process and completion go hand in hand and one aspect drives the other on.” ( unfortunately original source of quote unknown) For me this sums up his approach to creativity: no matter what support or material he uses all that he learns by working through the piece adds to his understanding of the subject he is trying to portray. Perhaps he is using his learned wood block skills as he carves expression out of oil paint squeezed directly onto the canvas and worked possibly with a variety of tools he sculpts his emotional message .From the freshly squeezed daubed strokes of skin tones in ‘Two nudes’ to the urgent agonised sweeps of them street’; each are a true hands on processes – each are experimental and tactile and each are expression of his take on life rather than fine art reproductions of a classical subject.

Ernst Ludwig Kirchner

I been unable to locate the original source for a Kirchner quote mentioned in several review articles for an exhibition in New York .

  • Dry brush- Lucien Freud- layers to create depth.

  • Henry Moore’s sheep drawings- for the essence of the characteristics of the subject.
  • John Marine- use of cold colours to evoke mood in a landscape-https://www.redraggallery.co.uk/showInventory.asp?iId=12151&title=Valldemossa&artist=John%20MARTIN. Martin has found a way to turn colour mood theory on it’s head. Instead of the meloncoly of Picasso in his wonderful blue period; this contemporary artist uses his technical knowledge to bring out the fresh and calming side of blue. While he does not appear to use as many clever tones, by placing it along side complimentary shades like terracotta the blues of his Mediterranean skies pop. It is interesting to note that white alongside a powder blue makes light on a tablecloth or building wall look equally radiant – again showing an experienced use of colour theory. I find this use of colours quite breathtaking ( even though this is a little ironic as blue is thought to lower BP and make breathing deeper

Gerhart Richter- Look at his ‘Atlas’ works so you can see the considerations of marks on semi-abstracted subjects.

  • Michael Raedecker- use of subtle colours which are atmospheric.
  • https://issuu.com/grimm_amsterdam/docs/mr_doc_issuu/22?ff – much of the commentary on Raedecker’s work acknowledges the strong atmospheric gloom in his works. He uses subtle tonal changes mainly hues of grey and a slightly washed out blue with strong black and green/ grey outlines. This contrast and strong markmaking hi lights his simple forms beautifully and somehow awakens all of the viewer’s senses to the gloom and smoky ashen world of his works. However, I also love how he uses the texture and contrast of white , pink and yellow embroidery on top to make the images pop.

  • Peter Doig- working with atmospheres and landscapes. Doig has worked all round the world and spent much time in the gloom and snow and dark of American forests and the bright colourful world Trinidadian . He uses these influences in the environment around him to produce an abstracted landscape- sometimes impressionistic dots and sometimes a tangle of lines and circles in transparent layers over scenery. For a long time this has evoked a sense of mystery and deeper meaning in the work- as if the viewer is there in a snow storm or voierism peering through trees at the back of someone’s home- there is both a peak in interest and a feeling of something sinister to come!
  • Charlotte Verity- working with textures and expressive marks on natural subjects- a wealth of delicate flowing marks that feel like thin and delicate stems and petals.

Research Part 3-self portraits

Albrecht Dürer, Self-Portrait 1498 and 1500


Zucher S. and Harris B. 2020: Khan Academy.Albrecht Dürer, Self-Portrait, 1500 (Alte Pinakothek, Munich) Speakers: Dr. Steven Zucker & Dr. Beth Harris. Created by Beth Harris and Steven Zucker

https://www.khanacademy.org/video/albrecht-d-rer-self-portrait-1500

accessed on 13/06/20

Credited as the first artist to produce a recorded self- portrait, Durer turned against the traditional tide of religious subjects. His reason was that of self promotion in a time before artists were seen as important. He depicted himself : initially as a confident young man wearing the apparel of man of wealth ( promoting the idea that artists were much grander than the Renaissance craftsman around him) .Two years later he revisited his self image portraying himself on this occasion as a figure of power, face on ( an angle of portraiture reserved in those years as the sign of Christ). Again his intention was to suggest for himself power and knowledge ( through his clothing).

In the 1498 picture he has long well painted curves and a very detailed features. The skin tones give perspective and show lighting from the right side. The way his head is tilted high and his sharp features suggest proudness in the stance rather than the usual sad or thoughtful poses of many self portraits.

The second portrait , face on ,show the same strong features and sparkling eyes. The skin tones differ greatly as it is painted in candle light showing only the forehead and hand bathed in rich yellow light. This is used as a powerful imagery of Christ and inferring for himself a status of power.

Judith Leyster – self portrait in 1663

Zucher S. and Harris B. 2020: Khan Academy. Judith Leyster, self portrait. On line.

https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/renaissance-reformation/baroque-art1/holland/v/le

Accessed on 13/06/20.

This is an important and essential work for Leyster and is believed to be an audition for entry to her local guild of painters I particularly like the way this has been painted as a moment caught in time as the artist turns to the front to talk to the viewer. The hi lights on the skin are beautifully painted in pale skin tones and the mouth is slightly open almost in a smile. I feel that these points make it very engaging. She has chosen to portray herself in fine clothes with a portrait in progress to prove to her peers that is is their equal. She is leaning casually back suggesting that she is happy and relaxed using a chair as a prop.

Later in life another self portrait shows her more serious this time- sitting straight back in her chair. Perhaps now she has a reputation as an established elder to maintain? This time there is only muted colour as a background ( she needs no clues to suggest who she is) and the colours are more muted perhaps again to give the feeling of seriousness. However that work is still engaging as the subtle tones do all the perspective work required.

Both of these artists use colour tones applied in a practised and skilful classical fine art technique. Backgrounds are painted in strongly and are photographic in quality. Interestingly no portraits by other artists have been found.

JM Turner

Although better known for land and seascapes, this Self portrait (1799) as a young man, is classically produced showing light powerfully hi lighting the front facing head and shoulders portrait, strikingly against a plain dark background.

He appears not to have painted himself in later years meaning there is no real comparison with the portrayal of other artists. It is interesting that others such as Thomas Smith choose to portray Turner from the side- profiling his rather large nose.https://www.tate.org.uk/art/artists/joseph-mallord-william-turner-558. Smith also uses impasto in a rather unflattering heavily applied manner suggesting a roughness not present in Turner’s own work.

Van Gough

Van Gough painted many self portraits throughout his life. I especially like the movement and emotion created by use of strong complimentary colours and impasto mark making. His strokes are thick yet achieve much definition. He paints head and shoulder pieces and rarely adds props – the most famous exception to this is the famous bandaged ear painting. This leads me to believe that he was trying to evoke personal internal emotions rather than making a statement about power or artistic accomplishment like Durer or Leyster.

Gogain paints his contemporary in a completely different manner: much flatter in perspective and seated at his easel painting his trademark sunflowers to identify him. Is this because Gogain may not be so confident in his likeness? Like Van Gough he paints in free sweeping strokes but the darker hues and flat less toned

Work somehow lacks the energy summoned by Van Gough himself. It is interesting that Van Gough felt Gogain is making fun of him- perhaps the overhead slightly stage angle does suggest the “ mad man” that Van Gough feels he is being portrayed as?

Francis Bacon

https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/489966

His late tryptic is striking. The heads stand out from the thick black background and as each is an angle to the left, centre and right of Bacon’s head they suggest something in-nerving. This is perhaps not surprising as in this article Bacon is quoted as saying he hate to look at his image. This may also be reflected in the unfinished appearance and slightly muted colours. However I spite of this the centre image is a clear resemblance to the artist and very similar to the version painted by fellow artist and muse Clare Shenstone. As her mentor she paints him in a more serious way- not poking fun as Bacon himself does. Shenstone chooses to direct his hands and posture sitting in a chair to show him thoughtful or relaxed. She also picks up the light in his face with some impasto and flecks of cream hi lights.